CO129-295 - Public Offices - 1899 — Page 26

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Fan duieted by the

Secretary Chamberlain

No state that the

repet to autom

The Indiifs that

it

It was owing to an

m'adrectence

an

Martofthis Deft

the

express his repet

that no affilication to the effect

was qua

a de

tem Caps Hacking'

lehalf at the time.

CAL

amet.

C.O.

24

DOMESTIC.

Office or Individual,

Admiralty

1899

19 May.

est previous Paper.

Admy

28334 28.

9198 m

вто

uly

Aday

20620

Aden.

disposed of 165

Res

- WBL(73)—1.2064~15909-12-ES

extaubsequent l'aper

6.

Gobl

No.

HONG KONG

12722

(Subject.)

12722

ED

NEOP 20 MAY 9

Extension of Naval Yard.

Crown Rent Lots 201 21

sends copycorear the Wo. request recman of decision resp Co Rent of thanne Lolo 200 21.

Mr Cox.

(Minutes.)

? Point out to the Admiralty (1) that in para 4 of their letter of 2nd March & in para 2 of their letter (28334) of 16th Dec's last no rent was charged to the War Dept, because the Roding in question was in the same position as the other portion of the Roding referred to in the 4th para: of our letter of the 30th Jay / 18421 & namely that having been purchased of the Pol: gove the Reut originally paid on the land was extinguished years ago,

If it ranevast the question of charging Reut again was never raised

that the course adopted therefore in regard to the other Loud referred to by the war office, namely of crediting the Capitulivet value of certain special Funk, cannot be adeptore for the reasons stated in our letter to the Treasury sending

The Reat to

a

reasons stated in our letter to the Treasury

the Admiralty copy of that letter & of the Treasury letter which

Edit History

2026-05-31 11:25:11 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Fan duieted by the Secretary Chamberlain No state that the repet to autom The Indiifs that it It was owing to an m'adrectence an Martofthis Deft the express his repet that no affilication to the effect was qua a de tem Caps Hacking' lehalf at the time. CAL amet. C.O. 24 DOMESTIC. Office or Individual, Admiralty 1899 19 May. est previous Paper. Admy 28334 28. 9198 m вто uly Aday 20620 Aden. disposed of 165 Res - WBL(73)—1.2064~15909-12-ES extaubsequent l'aper 6. Gobl No. HONG KONG 12722 (Subject.) 12722 ED NEOP 20 MAY 9 Extension of Naval Yard. Crown Rent Lots 201 21 sends copycorear the Wo. request recman of decision resp Co Rent of thanne Lolo 200 21. Mr Cox. (Minutes.) ? Point out to the Admiralty (1) that in para 4 of their letter of 2nd March & in para 2 of their letter (28334) of 16th Dec's last no rent was charged to the War Dept, because the Roding in question was in the same position as the other portion of the Roding referred to in the 4th para: of our letter of the 30th Jay / 18421 & namely that having been purchased of the Pol: gove the Reut originally paid on the land was extinguished years ago, If it ranevast the question of charging Reut again was never raised that the course adopted therefore in regard to the other Loud referred to by the war office, namely of crediting the Capitulivet value of certain special Funk, cannot be adeptore for the reasons stated in our letter to the Treasury sending The Reat to a reasons stated in our letter to the Treasury the Admiralty copy of that letter & of the Treasury letter which
Baseline (Original)
Fan duieted by th Secretary Chamberlain No state that the repet to autom The Indiifs that it It was owing to an m'adrectence an Martofthis Deft the express his repet that no affilication to the effect was qua a de tem Caps Hacking' lehalf at the time. CAL amet. C.O. 24 DOMESTIC. Office or Individual, Admiralty 1899 19 May. est previous Paper. Admy 28334 28. 9198 m вто uly Aday 20620 Aden. disposed of 165 Res - WBL (73)—1.2064~15909-12-ES extaubsequent l'aper 6. Gobl No. HÙNG KONG 12722 (Subject.) 12722 ED می مانیم NEOP 20 MAY 9 Extension of Naval Yard. Crown Rent Lots 201 21 sends copycorear the Wo. request recman of decision resp Co Rent of thanne Lolo 200 21. Mr Cox. (Minutes.) ? Point out to the Admirall in respect of Admiralty (1) that) (the in para 4 of 6.0 letterin of of arta referred to 2nd March & in para 2 the Admirally letter (2.8334) of 16th Dec's last no rent was charged to the Was Deft, because the Roding in position as the other portion of question was in the the Rondung referred to in the 384 para: of 9 * in our letter our letter of letter of the 3030th Jay / 18421 KÖKL the 6th Jany, (28334), & off in inamely that having been purchased of the Pol: gové the Reut originally paid on the land was extinguishe years ago, If it ranevast the question of charging Reut again was never raised that the course adopted therefre in regard to the other Loud referral to by the war office, namely of crediting the Capitulivet value of certain special Funk, cannot be adeptore for the on 24570 sending The Reat to a reasons stated in our letter to the Treasury the Admiralty copy of that letter & of the Treasury letter which
2026-05-31 11:25:11 · Baseline
View content

Fan duieted by th

Secretary Chamberlain

No state that the

repet to autom

The Indiifs that

it

It was owing to an

m'adrectence

an

Martofthis Deft

the

express his repet

that no affilication to the effect

was qua

a de

tem Caps Hacking'

lehalf at the time.

CAL

amet.

C.O.

24

DOMESTIC.

Office or Individual,

Admiralty

1899

19 May.

est previous Paper.

Admy

28334 28.

9198 m

вто

uly

Aday

20620

Aden.

disposed of 165

Res

- WBL (73)—1.2064~15909-12-ES

extaubsequent l'aper

6.

Gobl

No.

HÙNG KONG

12722

(Subject.)

12722

ED

می مانیم

NEOP 20 MAY 9

Extension of Naval Yard.

Crown Rent Lots 201 21

sends copycorear the Wo. request recman of decision resp Co Rent of thanne Lolo 200 21.

Mr Cox.

(Minutes.)

? Point out to the Admirall

in respect of

Admiralty (1) that) (the

in para 4 of 6.0 letterin

of

of

arta

referred to

2nd March & in para 2

the Admirally letter (2.8334) of 16th Dec's last no

rent was charged to the Was Deft, because the Roding in

position as the other portion of

question

was in the

the Rondung referred to in the 384 para: of

9

*

in our letter

our letter of

letter of the 3030th Jay / 18421

KÖKL

the 6th Jany, (28334), & off in inamely that having been purchased of the Pol: gové

the Reut originally paid on the land was extinguishe

years ago,

If it ranevast the question of charging Reut again was

never raised

that the course adopted

therefre

in

regard

to the other Loud

referral

to by the war office, namely of crediting the Capitulivet value of certain special Funk, cannot be adeptore for the on 24570 sending

The Reat to

a

reasons stated in our letter to the Treasury

the Admiralty copy of that letter & of the Treasury letter which

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.